Why the Price of Gold is Sinking Fast

The price of gold has dropped below $700 an ounce, and that has a lot of people in the precious metals community puzzled.

After all, isn’t gold supposed to be a safe haven in times of financial depression and panic?  And if these aren’t times of financial depression and panic, what are?

After all, every country in the world is busy running their printing presses to fund bailouts and fight deflationary forces.  Gold should be on its way up, not down.

If you want to see a good article on the topic, there is some nice coverage here on Marketwatch

Gold futures hit a historic high above $1,000 an ounce a few days after Bear Stearns was taken over by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. on March 14. But in the recent round of crises triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. gold has fallen to below $700 for the first time in 13 months. The metal has so far lost nearly $170 this month.
The reason, according to analysts at the World Gold Council, is that the latest bout of the credit crisis has been deeper and more far reaching. Funds were forced to sell desired assets such as gold to meet margin calls, while weakness in European economies lifted the U.S. dollar, which then pushed dollar-denominated gold prices lower.
One of my readers commented today on a blog post I wrote back in August 2007, “The Lessons of Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) & The Volatility of August 2007”.  That article is actually some of my better commentary to date on why historical diversification of assets isn’t helping very much in this downturn.  Here’s a snippet:

This decade has seen an amazing boom in investment tolerance for non-traditonal asset classes.  People freely talk about how different new investment assets have a “low correlation” to the stock market.  Real estate, commodities, rare coins, art, collectibles, long/short funds, you name it.   As a result, across the world, trillions of dollars are now factored into different asset classes, prudently distributed to minimize risk and maximize reward.

This would all be fine except for one thing.  And it’s the one thing that more than anything led to LTCM’s demise.

That one thing is that all of these great measures of risk are based on historical records.  And as all mutual fund prospectus readers know, “past history is not necessarily indicative of future performance.”

You see, you can take two things that historically have not been correlated.  Asset A & Asset B.  But the minute that an investor owns both A & B, there is now a correlation that didn’t exist historically.  The investor is that correlation.

If Asset A goes down, and the investor needs to sell something, they may now turn to Asset B for liquidity.  And that means selling pressure for Asset B, based on nothing but the asset price of Asset A.  Voila, correlation.

Gold didn’t used to trade like a stock in an ETF that anyone could buy.  It was expensive, hard to store, and was distributed through inefficient, clumsy channels.  It was diversified from other investment classes because it couldn’t be bought & sold easily like stocks or bonds.

Now, buying a Gold ETF is trivial, and can be done for less that $10 a trade with very little spread.  In fact, many commodities can.

All of a sudden, in this market, people are realizing that the investors are the correlation.  And that correlation is much stronger than historical analysis would suggest.

Not to get to gloomy, but re-reading my August 2007 post, I caught this somber realization:

What’s worse, those historical models lead investors to believe that they have less risk on their books than they do have, which leads rational investors to introduce leverage into their portfolios.  That means when the risk shows it’s ugly head, the results get magnified by the leverage of loans.

That’s what happened to LTCM.  Their models were excellent, but they were based on historical correlation.  The minute some of their investments turned the wrong way, their incredible leverage forced pressure in previously uncorrelated investments.  What’s worse, other investors, smelling the “blood in the water”, discovered this new-found correlation, and pressed trades against them.

So, this scares me a lot, at least intellectually.  There are very good reasons why major investors like hedge funds and other asset managers can’t share their up-to-the-minute holdings.  That means, however, that no one really understands this type of “co-investment risk” that is building in mass across the markets.  Unfortunately, the only way I can imagine to properly handle this risk would be to have a universal monitoring set up to accurately reflect this new type of correlation from mass “co-investment” across assets.

Ugh.

11 thoughts on “Why the Price of Gold is Sinking Fast

  1. i either disagree or don’t understand your point between the thousand articles you quoted.

    i believe one of the biggest drivers behind this crazy collapse in gold is hedge fund delevering. They’re being forced to generate cash for redemptions, and gold is one of the few things that hasn’t lost like half it’s value.

  2. I’m happy to say we agree, Surya. It’s just the mismash of linked posts that is confusing.

    Normally, you wouldn’t expect gold to be counter-cyclical for this type of monetary environment. The reason its dropping is, like you said, hedge fund deleveraging.

    Gold is now easily tradable as a financial asset, which is why it is so easy for so many hedge funds to own it and liquidate it quickly. Therefore, it is now heavily correlated with the rest of the financial assets because when the portfolio drops, they quickly turn to gold to raise cash.

    My point above (as it was in 2007) is that the investors themselves introduce correlation. In this case, the investors are the hedge funds, and the vehicle that enabled it is the ETF.

    Adam

  3. This is an interesting angle that I haven’t seen discussed before. I recently put together a laundry list of all the reasons people cite for gold not being higher, wish I picked this up earlier. While it’s certainly not the only thing keeping gold down, it must be a contributing factor.

  4. Pingback: Gold and Silver News & Headlines for October 25 | Gold and Silver Blog

  5. Adam, one wonders why gold is such an attraction irrespective of market conditions. To put money into anything but a mattress would apply the investor has one of two goals (not mutually exclusive): to get rich or to save for a comfortable future. Unless the desire to be rich is immediate or the comfortable future starts tomorrow, why would not the prudent investor do what Graham, Dodds, or Buffett would do? Buy stock in quality companies at the cheapest possible price and hang on. If one has bought a turkey mutual fund, sell it and buy Coca Cola. Why buy gold? It has never gone anywhere. In the late 70s you could get $800 krugerands, today you can get $800 krugerands. The time value of money says you have lost your shirt. Gimme KO stock any day.

  6. Bill,

    I don’t disagree with you in the aggregate. I’ve never been one to allocate a large percentage of assets to gold. For the most part, a broad commodity index gives you better diversification from a portfolio analysis standpoint, and there always seem to be too many gotchas with gold.

    That being said, the track record for gold collectible coins (vs. gold) is quite good. It seems that the collectible nature of the coins adds an element that is indexed to disposable income, rather than just a commodity.

    Both, however, are still more correlated with stocks now than most people give credit to.

    My grandfather used to say that there was no point investing in gold, because the only future where gold is worth a significant amount is a future where everything else is so bad it won’t matter.

    Adam

  7. sir;

    i must agree with your grandfather, yet i have diversified my now-tattered
    portfolio by investing in that most melancholic of precious metals-
    copper-jacketed lead. i hope that you have done the same and that we never have cause to use it.

    fighting over resources has never been “my thing”, but there are a few people left for who i must still do so.

    good luck to us all,
    d

  8. Pingback: Why Is Gold Falling In Price | WTC Ground Zero PCGS Certified Coins

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s