<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn Hacks: Advanced Search Operators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.adamnash.com/2009/01/09/linkedin-hacks-advanced-search-operators-in-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2009/01/09/linkedin-hacks-advanced-search-operators-in-search/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Adam Nash</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Nash</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2009/01/09/linkedin-hacks-advanced-search-operators-in-search/#comment-26442</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.adamnash.com/?p=1045#comment-26442</guid>
		<description>You can do that search, but there is a bug right now where it doesn&#039;t handle &quot;present company&quot; and &quot;past company&quot; correctly - we should have it fixed in a few weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can do that search, but there is a bug right now where it doesn&#8217;t handle &#8220;present company&#8221; and &#8220;past company&#8221; correctly &#8211; we should have it fixed in a few weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2009/01/09/linkedin-hacks-advanced-search-operators-in-search/#comment-26413</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.adamnash.com/?p=1045#comment-26413</guid>
		<description>sorry for repost but forgot to check the notify me by email
of followup comments, so reposting ...

Can one do advanced search like the following - it does not
seem to work for me but perhaps am getting syntax not correct ?

all people who now work at company A   AND who worked in past at company B

there are adv operators pcompany and ccompany but yet
in regular advanced search choices are only for either
previous company or current company or both -- but
if both would just return people who now or in past worked
at the chosen companies, 

NOT those who now work at company A AND who worked
in past at company B

Any suggestions ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for repost but forgot to check the notify me by email<br />
of followup comments, so reposting &#8230;</p>
<p>Can one do advanced search like the following &#8211; it does not<br />
seem to work for me but perhaps am getting syntax not correct ?</p>
<p>all people who now work at company A   AND who worked in past at company B</p>
<p>there are adv operators pcompany and ccompany but yet<br />
in regular advanced search choices are only for either<br />
previous company or current company or both &#8212; but<br />
if both would just return people who now or in past worked<br />
at the chosen companies, </p>
<p>NOT those who now work at company A AND who worked<br />
in past at company B</p>
<p>Any suggestions ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick OMalley</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2009/01/09/linkedin-hacks-advanced-search-operators-in-search/#comment-25870</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick OMalley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.adamnash.com/?p=1045#comment-25870</guid>
		<description>I realized that when I saw the Learning Center page, but still thought my Ppat line was funny.

By the way, the new search features didn&#039;t work when I tried them, and I&#039;m a search guy (former VP for Northern Light, the search engine that was tied with Google in 2000).

Shame, because they would/will be cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realized that when I saw the Learning Center page, but still thought my Ppat line was funny.</p>
<p>By the way, the new search features didn&#8217;t work when I tried them, and I&#8217;m a search guy (former VP for Northern Light, the search engine that was tied with Google in 2000).</p>
<p>Shame, because they would/will be cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Nash</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2009/01/09/linkedin-hacks-advanced-search-operators-in-search/#comment-25869</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.adamnash.com/?p=1045#comment-25869</guid>
		<description>ccompany: stands for &quot;current company&quot;, which differentiates it from &quot;past company&quot; which is pcompany:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ccompany: stands for &#8220;current company&#8221;, which differentiates it from &#8220;past company&#8221; which is pcompany:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick OMalley</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2009/01/09/linkedin-hacks-advanced-search-operators-in-search/#comment-25868</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick OMalley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.adamnash.com/?p=1045#comment-25868</guid>
		<description>Good article.  By the way, I think you spelled ccompany wrong.

Ppat

http://www.patrickomalley.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  By the way, I think you spelled ccompany wrong.</p>
<p>Ppat</p>
<p><a href="http://www.patrickomalley.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.patrickomalley.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
