<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The $812K Question: Will Social Security Be Around in 2045?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/11/03/the-812k-question-will-social-security-be-around-in-2045/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/11/03/the-812k-question-will-social-security-be-around-in-2045/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Adam Nash</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom sheridan</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/11/03/the-812k-question-will-social-security-be-around-in-2045/#comment-25029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom sheridan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychohistory.wordpress.com/2006/11/03/the-812k-question-will-social-security-be-around-in-2045/#comment-25029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get ssi and ssdi. I would like to know if these programs will be around forvever?

Please e-mail me at tomp1253@msn.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get ssi and ssdi. I would like to know if these programs will be around forvever?</p>
<p>Please e-mail me at <a href="mailto:tomp1253@msn.com">tomp1253@msn.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woessner</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/11/03/the-812k-question-will-social-security-be-around-in-2045/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Woessner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychohistory.wordpress.com/2006/11/03/the-812k-question-will-social-security-be-around-in-2045/#comment-280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn&#039;t particularly insightful, but it&#039;s another way of looking at things.  You can also view the rule of 25 as an extremely aggressive rule with a 50% safety margin.  Suppose you put all your assets in an S&amp;P 500 index fund.  The next day, the market crashes.  You lose 50% of your assets.  Assuming your investment resumes its historical return, how much of your &lt;i&gt;original&lt;/i&gt; amount can you withdraw?

I = P(exp(r) - 1)

where I is the annual interest, P is the principal amount and r is the annual rate of reutrn.  Since you lost half your original amount, we&#039;ll use P = 1/2.  The historical return of the S&amp;P 500 is 7.7% after inflation.

I = (exp(7.7%) - 1) / 2 = 4%

Oualla!  The rule of 25.

BTW, I don&#039;t think you should count on Social Security being around in 2045.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t particularly insightful, but it&#8217;s another way of looking at things.  You can also view the rule of 25 as an extremely aggressive rule with a 50% safety margin.  Suppose you put all your assets in an S&amp;P 500 index fund.  The next day, the market crashes.  You lose 50% of your assets.  Assuming your investment resumes its historical return, how much of your <i>original</i> amount can you withdraw?</p>
<p>I = P(exp(r) &#8211; 1)</p>
<p>where I is the annual interest, P is the principal amount and r is the annual rate of reutrn.  Since you lost half your original amount, we&#8217;ll use P = 1/2.  The historical return of the S&amp;P 500 is 7.7% after inflation.</p>
<p>I = (exp(7.7%) &#8211; 1) / 2 = 4%</p>
<p>Oualla!  The rule of 25.</p>
<p>BTW, I don&#8217;t think you should count on Social Security being around in 2045.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Nash</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/11/03/the-812k-question-will-social-security-be-around-in-2045/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Nash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychohistory.wordpress.com/2006/11/03/the-812k-question-will-social-security-be-around-in-2045/#comment-279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it&#039;s a very conservative estimate.  It basically says I can&#039;t predict when I am going to die, and I don&#039;t want to take any risk that I will run out of money before I die.

There are far more sophisticated methods to attempt to plan out withdrawals, asset class mix, and life expectancy to boost your withdrawal rate.  However, they all include some amount of risk that you will actually run out of money before you die.

I&#039;ve heard some people adjust their withdrawal rate up to 5% to account for this.  But I think you&#039;ll find in most personal finance journals they always tend to recommend 4-5% as the maximum you can &quot;rely on&quot; without depleting your funds early.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a very conservative estimate.  It basically says I can&#8217;t predict when I am going to die, and I don&#8217;t want to take any risk that I will run out of money before I die.</p>
<p>There are far more sophisticated methods to attempt to plan out withdrawals, asset class mix, and life expectancy to boost your withdrawal rate.  However, they all include some amount of risk that you will actually run out of money before you die.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard some people adjust their withdrawal rate up to 5% to account for this.  But I think you&#8217;ll find in most personal finance journals they always tend to recommend 4-5% as the maximum you can &#8220;rely on&#8221; without depleting your funds early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klep</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/11/03/the-812k-question-will-social-security-be-around-in-2045/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychohistory.wordpress.com/2006/11/03/the-812k-question-will-social-security-be-around-in-2045/#comment-277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t your 4% rule imply that you&#039;ll never die? Or at least, it prepares for the possibility. Even if you assume you die at 150, that should greatly reduce the amount you need to save.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t your 4% rule imply that you&#8217;ll never die? Or at least, it prepares for the possibility. Even if you assume you die at 150, that should greatly reduce the amount you need to save.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

