<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pluto is a Planet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/08/24/pluto-is-a-planet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/08/24/pluto-is-a-planet/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Adam Nash</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:35:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pluto is a Planet, Redux &#171; Psychohistory</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/08/24/pluto-is-a-planet/#comment-24746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pluto is a Planet, Redux &#171; Psychohistory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://psychohistory.wordpress.com/2006/08/24/pluto-is-a-planet/#comment-24746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pluto is a Planet [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pluto is a Planet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychohistory New Horizons Spacecraft Swings by Jupiter. Next Stop, Pluto, Charon &#38; the Kuiper Belt &#171;</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/08/24/pluto-is-a-planet/#comment-3207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Psychohistory New Horizons Spacecraft Swings by Jupiter. Next Stop, Pluto, Charon &#38; the Kuiper Belt &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 06:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://psychohistory.wordpress.com/2006/08/24/pluto-is-a-planet/#comment-3207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the Kuiper&#160;Belt March 1st, 2007 &#8212; Adam Nash   One of my first posts on this blog was about Pluto, namely the incredibly stupid move to re-classify it as a dwarf planet. For the first month of my [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Kuiper&nbsp;Belt March 1st, 2007 &#8212; Adam Nash   One of my first posts on this blog was about Pluto, namely the incredibly stupid move to re-classify it as a dwarf planet. For the first month of my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search vs. Comments: What Posts do People Like? &#171; Psychohistory</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/08/24/pluto-is-a-planet/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Search vs. Comments: What Posts do People Like? &#171; Psychohistory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 05:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://psychohistory.wordpress.com/2006/08/24/pluto-is-a-planet/#comment-13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pluto is a Planet (2) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pluto is a Planet (2) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margo Schulter</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/08/24/pluto-is-a-planet/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margo Schulter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://psychohistory.wordpress.com/2006/08/24/pluto-is-a-planet/#comment-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about a compromise, borrowed from the biological discipline of taxonomy?
We could say that _sensu latu_, or &quot;broadly speaking,&quot; Plato is still a planet -- along with the other &quot;dwarf planets&quot; of the new IAU definition.
However, only the eight &quot;planets&quot; of the new definition would be considered planets &quot;strictly or narrowly speaking,&quot; or _sensu strictu_.
In biology, the sensu strictu/sensu latu distinction accommodates situations where a given species of mushroom, for example, might come to be defined more narrowly, like &quot;planet&quot; under the new IAU decision; but historical usage is still influential and merits recognition.
Another term for the eight planets in the narrow sense that I like is &quot;major planets,&quot; maybe a bit more familiar and evocative than the proposed &quot;classical planets&quot; of what became the minority position among those who took part in the final vote.
From an historical perspective, I like the reinstatement of Ceres as a &quot;dwarf planet,&quot; and in my view also a planet broadly speaking (as it was regarded when discovered in 1801); and a definition which would recognize Pluto and Charon as making up a &quot;double planet&quot; system.
A diplomatic solution of this kind, letting astronomy enrich itself by borrowing a nice distinction from a sister science, would do some justice to both sides in the debate, and retain the insights gained in the process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a compromise, borrowed from the biological discipline of taxonomy?<br />
We could say that _sensu latu_, or &#8220;broadly speaking,&#8221; Plato is still a planet &#8212; along with the other &#8220;dwarf planets&#8221; of the new IAU definition.<br />
However, only the eight &#8220;planets&#8221; of the new definition would be considered planets &#8220;strictly or narrowly speaking,&#8221; or _sensu strictu_.<br />
In biology, the sensu strictu/sensu latu distinction accommodates situations where a given species of mushroom, for example, might come to be defined more narrowly, like &#8220;planet&#8221; under the new IAU decision; but historical usage is still influential and merits recognition.<br />
Another term for the eight planets in the narrow sense that I like is &#8220;major planets,&#8221; maybe a bit more familiar and evocative than the proposed &#8220;classical planets&#8221; of what became the minority position among those who took part in the final vote.<br />
From an historical perspective, I like the reinstatement of Ceres as a &#8220;dwarf planet,&#8221; and in my view also a planet broadly speaking (as it was regarded when discovered in 1801); and a definition which would recognize Pluto and Charon as making up a &#8220;double planet&#8221; system.<br />
A diplomatic solution of this kind, letting astronomy enrich itself by borrowing a nice distinction from a sister science, would do some justice to both sides in the debate, and retain the insights gained in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shumona</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamnash.com/2006/08/24/pluto-is-a-planet/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shumona]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://psychohistory.wordpress.com/2006/08/24/pluto-is-a-planet/#comment-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do people expect me to just go on liek nothing has changed?  And has anyone asked how Pluto is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.officepirates.com/officepirates/fyi/0,26102,1328919,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; dealing with the demotion? &lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do people expect me to just go on liek nothing has changed?  And has anyone asked how Pluto is <a href="http://www.officepirates.com/officepirates/fyi/0,26102,1328919,00.html" rel="nofollow"> dealing with the demotion? </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

